Diagnosis and prevention with or without sentence context lexical definitions in young people aged between 8 and 12

Contenido principal del artículo

Aprile Luigi

Resumen

Our hypothesis foresees the presence of the following lexical abilities: synonyms, antonyms, categories, word function with or without sentence context. 215 girls and 257 boys in third grade, 240 girls and 255 boys in fourth grade, 245 girls and 276 boys in fifth grade (for a total of 1488) participated in this research project. The experiment was divided into 2 phases. In the first phase, 100 boys and girls, divided by age were asked to define words with high image value and dominant meaning and frequency of use in a list. The words were taken from short readings of elementary school literature. The passages used were those reflecting a popularity rating above 80%. The Flesch index of readability (with a value between 64 and 73, higher than mean value of 50) was applied to the readings. In the first phase we recorded the answers the children gave to questions such as “What does word X mean?” or “How would you define word X?”. The children were asked to provide the best written definition according to them. They were with no problems in reading and writing processes. We then proceeded to elaborate the test with four multiple choice questions. In the second phase, using the definitions provided by the children, we used trials subject to item analysis using calculations based on: index of difficulty, ability to distinguish, reliability factor (using the Kuder-Richardson formula). The definitive test was divided into eight parts including: synonyms, antonyms, categories, contextual and non contextual functions (PAV or Analytical Vocabulary Test, Florence, O.S., 1991).The results showed by means of factorial analysis times principle components (varimax method, N = 1488) the presence of two principal factors: Factor 1, contextual and Factor 2, non contextual. This data would seem to confirm that subjects when working out the definition of words, need two types of information: the context of the sentence in which the word is used (Factor 1, contextual) and the definition of the word without referring to the sentence (Factor 2, non contextual).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Luigi, A. (2015). Diagnosis and prevention with or without sentence context lexical definitions in young people aged between 8 and 12. Revista INFAD De Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology., 1(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2015.n2.v1.320
Sección
Artículos

Citas

Al-Issa, I. (1969). The development of word definition in children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 114, 25-28.

Anglin, J. M. (1970). The growth of word meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.

Anglin, J. M. (1985). The child’s expressible knowledge of word concepts: What preschoolers can say about the meaning of some nouns and verbs. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language, vol. V (pp. 77-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Aprile, L. (2012). Sviluppo del vocabolario. Teorie, ricerche, strumenti operativi. Torino: Utet Università [Vocabulary Development. Theories, Researches, Instruments. Turin: Utet University].

Arcaini, E. (1982). Procedimenti “definitori” nei bambini: aspetti e problemi. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 14, 77-100. [‘Defining’ processes in children: aspects and problems. Italian Applied Linguistics Review]

Arcuri, L., & Girotto, V. (1986). Norme di tipicità per sei categorie naturali. Uno studio evolutivo. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 13, 409-442. [Typicality norms for six natural categories. An evolutionary

study. Italian Journal of Psychology]

Bartlett, E. J. (1978). The acquisition of the meaning of color terms: A study of lexical development.

In R. N. Campbell & P. T. Smith (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language: Language development and mother-child interaction (pp. 89-108). New York: Plenum Press.

Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Boschi, F., Aprile, L., & Scibetta, I. (1991). Prove Analitiche di Vocabolario PAV. Firenze: O.S. [PAV or Analytical Vocabulary Test. Firenze: O.S.]

Chall, J. S. (1987). Two vocabularies for reading: Recognition and meaning. In M. G. McKeown, & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 7-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates.

Clark, E. V. (1973). What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (65-110). N e w

York: Academic Press.

Clark, E. V. (1978). Strategies for communicating. Child Development, 49, 953-959.

Clark, E. V. (1979). Building a vocabulary: Words for objects, actions, and relations. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 149-160). Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

De Mauro, T. (2000). Il dizionario della lingua italiana. Torino: Paravia. [The dictionary of the Italian language. Turin: Paravia]

DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Impact Information. Costa Mesa, CA: William DuBay.

Ehri, L. C., & Richardson, D. (1972). Antonym adjective contexts and facilitation of noun-pair learning in children. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 387-397.

Girotti, G., Antonietti, A., & Marchetti, A. (1990). Norme di prototipicità e stima oggettiva e soggettiva della frequenza d’uso di parole italiane. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 193-194, 69-84.

[Prototypicality norms and objective and subjective estimate of use frequency in Italian words. Applied Psychology Bulletin]

Grossman, L., & Eagle, M. (1970). Synonymity, antonymity and association in false recognition responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 244-248.

Hermann, D. J. (1978). An old problem for the new psychosemantics: Synonymity. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 490-512.

Kuczaj, S. A., & Barrett, M. D. (1986). The development of word meaning: Progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer Verlag.

Litowitz, B. (1977). Learning to make definitions. Journal of Child Language, 4, 289-304.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language: The study of developmental psycholinguistics. New York: Harper & Row.

Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P.M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257, 94-99.

Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instructions. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary

acquisition (pp. 19-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (1-2, Serial No. 149).

Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review, 81, 267-285.

Nelson, K. (1978). Semantic development and the development of semantic memory. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language, vol. I (pp. 39-80). New York: Gardner Press.

Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York: Academic Press.

Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge. Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Niemi, P., Vauras, M., & von Wright, J. (1980). Semantic activation due to synonym, antonym, and rhyme production. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 103-107.

Petter, G. (1955). Ricerche sperimentali sull’apprendimento linguistico nei ragazzi. Rivista di Psicologia, 1, 67-94. [Experimental research on linguistic learning in children. Psychology Magazine]

Powell, W. R. (1986). Teaching vocabulary through opposition. Journal of Reading, 29, 617-621.

Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120-136.

Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659.

Tabossi, P., Colombo, L., & Job, R. (1987). Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research, 49, pp. 161-167.

Tabossi, P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Linguistic context and the priming of semantic information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 595-603.

Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1950). Development of word meaning through verbal context: An experimental study. Journal of Psychology, 29, 251-257.

Werner, H., & Kaplan, E. (1952). The acquisition of word meaning: A developmental study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 15, (Serial No. 51, No. 1).